For the microbiome implant infection project that I am
working on, we inoculate the mice with S.
aureus during a knee implant surgery. Since the gut microbiome influences
immunity, we expect that the severity of the implant infection will be affected
by the mouse’s microbiome. Because of the amount of time needed for breeding,
surgery, and analysis, unfortunately I won’t know the results of the study
before I leave. While we are waiting for
the next round of surgeries, I spent the week working with the S. aureus strain and exploring some of
the other experiments going on with different groups in the lab.
In the microbiome implant infection project, we use a
specific clinical strain of S. aureus called
Xen 36. I have found that this strain is a bit more difficult to work with than
the more robust non-clinical strains I got used at Cold Spring Harbor. The Xen
36 colonies grow much slower and smaller on the agar plates than I am used to,
and Xen 36 requires extra washing steps before measuring absorbance and inoculation.
Talking to the other people in the lab, I wasn’t sure why the extra washing step
was there. I was particularly interested in how the washing affected absorbance
and growth, so the other interns and I set up a small experiment. I suspected
that the washing removed a lot of the bacteria. We grew a liquid culture over
two hours, and every twenty minutes we removed an aliquot to measure absorbance,
wash, and measure absorbance again. The cultures had a significantly higher
absorbance before washing compare to after washing. I think that the washing step
removes a significant number of bacteria as well as any extracellular products
the bacteria have produced. After some literature searches, we found that bacterial
extracellular products can also boost the immune reaction. In an actual joint
infection, you wouldn’t expect a fully mature liquid culture with extracellular
products to infect a patient, just a couple isolated bacteria. To make the model
as clinically relevant as possible, the cells must be washed before inoculation.
Since I am only used to working with bacteria, I was focused on the bacterial growth.
This was an important lesson to me to remember the bacteria host interaction.
I also got to see some cool procedures going on with other
groups in the lab. One surgeon performed surgeries on a group of twenty mice to
induce osteoarthritis. The most common methods for inducing osteoarthritis in a
mouse model are surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) and anterior
cruciate ligament transection (ACLT). Both methods cause an instability in the knee
that accelerates cartilage wear. I also got to see a method for DNA extraction
using magnetic beads and how sections of bone get embedded in paraffin,
sectioned with a microtome, and stained.
This week was more research focused because my mentor was
away for part of the week at the conference. I’m excited to get back in the OR
next week when he returns!
No comments:
Post a Comment