This week I observed several hip and knee revision surgeries
in the OR. The most interesting case for me was a patient receiving their
second knee revision surgery. The first revision involved implanting a rather
large tibial stem, but unfortunately that stem did not osteointegrate as well
as the surgeons had hoped. Over time, the combination of the forces applied while
walking and poor osteointegration drove the stem deeper and deeper into the
tibia, leading to misalignment of the joint. Preforming a second revision is pretty
uncommon and can be really tricky because so much of the bone has already been removed.
Because this case was so unique, an engineer in the biomechanics group designed
a custom implant. He came into the surgery to answer any questions the surgeons
had about his implant during the operation, but during the opening incision and
preparation he took some time to chat with me about the mechanics of the revision.
It’s exciting to see how engineers directly impact patients outcomes. The
tibial portion of the implant had cone leading into the tibial shaft. The wider
area of the cone should prevent the tibial component from sinking down like the
first revision. The tibial component was connected with a hinge joint to the femoral
component. The hinge increases stability of the joint, but it does restrict
motion. The hinge joint isn’t a true hinge like you might see on a door; it is
more like a loose hinge that allows for some extra rotation and extension besides
the main flexion and extension. Maintaining these extra degrees of freedom
helps make walking more natural. Luckily, the femoral stem component was well
fixed in the bone, so they only had to change the surface. This was a good reminder
to me about the importance of modular components. Overall this revision was an
impressive feat, and I found it so satisfying to seeing the engineering and
surgical aspects come together.
On the research side, we did our first trial of crystal violet
staining this week. Crystal violet is a way of quantifying bacterial biofilm
formation. Eventually the lab would like to use this technique and others to
assess the amount and maturity of biofilms on the mouse tibial implants. This
week we confirmed that we could grow biofilms in six well plates on the shaking
incubator and the biofilms were visible using crystal violet stain. In the future
the lab would like to be able to correlate crystal violet absorbance directly
to the colony forming unit count.
It’s hard to believe that summer immersion is already over. I
appreciate that everyone here welcomed me and gave me this clinical experience.
I am excited to take what I have learned back to Ithaca!
No comments:
Post a Comment